Milburnie Dam Public Meeting Q&A


– Now we’re ready to enter the question and answer portion of the evening. A couple of ground rules to set out. When you checked-in,
we had people indicate if you wanted to ask a question. Obviously, maybe your
question was answered, and if so, that’s fine, you
can just raise your hand and say no problem, go to the next one. But we’re gonna take people,
we’re gonna call people up to the microphone in the middle so that we can get all this on the record. We’re gonna call people
up to the microphone in the middle in the
order that you signed in, if you indicated you
want to ask a question. Because we have so many folks
who want to ask questions, we ask you to keep it to
one question per person and we ask you to limit your question to a minute or less. That’s so that everyone can
have an opportunity to ask. If we have additional time, once everybody has had an opportunity to ask a question, then we’ll go back and you
can ask a second question. – [Man] Is this considered open forum? It seems to me like
there’s been several hours to one side, probably a few
minutes from the other side. That doesn’t seem (mumbles). – This is a public information workshop where we’ll have an opportunity for folks, like yourself, to come up. (mumbles) The purpose of this is to learn more about what’s going on with this proposal and where it stands in the process and for you to raise
questions that you might have. – [Man] And terms? – Absolutely. Alright, we’ll go ahead and begin. If at any point you
have follow-up questions or don’t feel like your question
was adequately addressed, Lauris, the person standing in the back is ready to take your information, your complete question,
and we will make sure that Restoration Systems
or one of the experts gets back to you personally
to address that question and make sure that all of
your concerns are addressed. So the first question
comes from Bob Emmanuel. Is Bob here? – [Bob] Yes, I have no question,
I deffer to the others. – Okay, thank you, Mr. Emmanuel. The next question is Michael Williams. – [Michael] No question. – You guys are making this too easy. Next question is David Rhodes. – [David] Yes, my name is David Rhodes. – Can you just come
stand at the microphone? Thank you. – My name is David Rhodes
and I live here in Raleigh. In fact, very near here Hedingham, I was wondering about
how long we should expect to see the benefits of
once the dam is removed, what is the time frame you think we might start to see the benefits of the dam removal. – [Matt] Adam, do you want to start? Thank you, Dave. (mumbling) Speak up. – I’m trying. I might be a PhD, but I
can’t operate a microphone. To answer your question, it depends on what particular part of the ecosystem you’re looking for a change in. Expect to see habitats start to shift as soon as water’s released
from behind the dam and that will be an ongoing process. It’ll happen a little
bit more with each flow. Each rain, Spring event,
or release from Falls Dam. It will re-distribute
some of the sediments into new forms and into new places. That is the basis of most of the change that you’re going to see. That will become the
habitat that will then support the biology as it comes
back into the impoundment. It’ll take some time. I think that Tim and Matt here can expand on that a good bit. As far as water quality goes, that will be pretty instantaneous. Usually you don’t have
these water quality problems in the Winter months,
as in the Summer months. So if the dam is removed in Fall/Winter, come Spring and Summer, you won’t have those issues anymore. Anybody else want to expand? – With the dam removal projects that we’ve been involved in
and doing the monitoring of as well as the literature on dam removal that exists throughout
the country and the world, some of the fastest responders are those Benthic macroinvertebrates. Why that’s important is
that those are gonna be one of the essential
basis of the food chain for the fishes and the
birds and other things to come in there and be
able to take advantage of some of the hallower habitats. While they may not be
eating the bugs directly, some of the smaller minnows
will also be attracted to those birds, so the
Benthic macroinvertebrates responding within the first season is something we’ve seen in the past. They don’t get to their
ultimate improvement in that first season, but you already see a dramatic shift because a lot of their lifespan is annual for some species, while it’s several years for some of the longer life. But they’ll be coming
in and deposit the eggs and as soon as the flowing
water habitat is there and in the ripples, which is one of the most rich habitats in
the river ecosystem like that, you’ll start to see the
change that Fall and Spring. – Basically, I guess every
dam removal’s different and different systems will respond at different rates. Our experience with the two
that we’ve been involved with with Carbonton Dam and the Lowell Dam, the fish community
response was fairly quick. Within the first year of
monitoring we saw improvement and continued to see improvement through the five-year monitoring period. We didn’t expect the mussels to show improvement very quickly, and that’s mainly associated
with their life cycle. They require a fish basis to
complete their life cycle. And they’re not very mobile. So it takes them a while
to populate new areas. However, with Carbonton,
the mussel recovery was quite a lot quicker than we expected. By year three, we’re seeing rare species that weren’t there before
show up in low numbers in the form of impoundment. With Lowell, that was a little slower, but we did see improvement by year five with the fresh water mussels. – The next question
comes from Mr. Bob Davis. – Realizing that we’re not talking about a specific point
in time, but a range of time period, I’m just curious what kind of timeframe we’re talking about for the actual removal down the line. – Do you mean the deconstruction
of the dam itself, or the time period from now
’til it will be deconstructed? – [Bob] I’d like to know when
it will be deconstructed. – How much longer are we looking at before that actually happens? – That’s kind of a permitting
question in our business. That’s always an important question and we’ve learned the
hard way of the years that we don’t count on things
happening anytime soon. As you can see, we’re
at a preliminary stage and we’ve got four years into it. I would say most hopefully by next Fall, but most likely, by the following Fall. – [Bob] Thank you. – Thank you. Jim Nelson is next. – I have several
questions about (mumbles). – Thank you.
– As we said, it’s a simple one. How much would the water
level in the river be reduced? – Great question, and as you can imagine, it’s probably on a lot of people’s minds and I apologize for not
including that information in the presentation. My forever reason, my 60
slides didn’t have room for it. The answer is, it depends. I hate to be a broken record because that was my answer to the other question. It depends on where you’re
looking in today’s impoundment. The dam obviously, it creates deep water, but the water gets deeper as
you get closer to the dam. There’s quite a variation in the depth of that impoundment now. Here at the very top of it, it can be a foot or two right now. If you’re really close to the dam, it could be eight, 10 feet. I think worse case scenario,
you’ll see an adjustment under normal flow conditions close to the dam about eight feet now. As you go upstream — – [Man] The water by the dam
will be eight feet shallower? – That would be my expectation, yes. If you go upstream, you’re gonna find much shallow areas and much deeper areas, depending on where you are
because what we’ll see, pools will form and ripples will form and you’ll see a lot
of variation in depth. – How will that be conducive
to canoeing and kayaking? – It should be okay. I’ve canoed the river both above the dam, above the impoundment I should say, and below the impoundment. I think for those that are curious and have access to the river, that’s what I would encourage you to do. Put in above the impoundment,
float to the impoundment, and get a sense for what that stretch of the river is like without a dam. Once you get to the
impoundment, you’ll know it. It will change enough. It will get slow, it will get deep, it will get a little wider. And then be very careful,
forage around the dam, put it below it and float. Float further. And you’ll get a sense, it’ll be different above it and below it. But it’s a rip above it and below it. That should give you some
sense as to what to expect. – Thank you. Camille Warren. – Hi, I’m Camille Warren, and I’m a kayaker. I’m a member of two paddling clubs based here in the triangle. And did notice that sone of the factors that are considered are
recreational factors and my interests are
historical and recreational. I’ve done a lot of research on the web about the dam and it’s got
some very interesting history. The original dam was built
as an eight foot timber dam before the Civil War. And then around 1900, the current Granite Block and Mesa Route Dam was built to a height of 16 feet (mumbling). The granite blocks were locally poured and given that and the fact that the dam is so much history of this area, I really feel like they belong to Raleigh in Wade County and it would be really wonderful if the blocks would be donated to the City of Raleigh for it to use as it sees fit in the Milburnie Park that it will build some day. The other thing is as a paddler, I enjoy flat water paddling and have enjoyed paddling
in Flat Waters Bridge above the dam, but I also do white water paddling,
and have enjoyed that. In some of the old historical references I have read about Milburnie Dam, some of the very old things I found refer to even older documents that talked about Milburnie Falls. And of course, we all know, these dams that were
built for power generation to run mills or whatever, were often built at falls because they could take better advantage of the fall of the water. There are places in the country where dams have been
removed strategically, in such a way as to create really nice white water features, and in fact, in San Marcos, Texas, dam removal was done in such a way that created this beautiful river park with
white water features. Given the fact the dam is coming down, there’s very likely some interesting, natural white water features there. Nobody knows, it’s been 150 years. It would just be a real shame to pass up the opportunity
to take advantage of that using what’s there and perhaps, even some of the blots to create a wonderful white water paddling location. And so that’s not really a question. – No, but I think — – No, that’s a fine comment though. I’m glad the corps of
engineers was here to see it, that there’s public
support for doing that. You could imagine, when we do that, it tends to just complicate the plan because we’ve got a particular objective we’re trying to reach. But if it can enhance the plan and make it more attractive
to have it removed, and help please our regulators, then of course we would consider that. We’ve already done a lot of work with Elizabeth Gardner and her club. And we’re actually
gonna be contributors — – [Camille] I belong to that club. – Yeah, and we’re gonna contribute to the white water park,
and we’re gonna follow what we feel we’re a part
of that river’s community. Whether we do something on the site, possibly as a result of your comment and interest of the corp, or whether we’re working upstream with the paddling groups,
that’s one of our objectives. We want to make recreation
better on the river and very much appreciate your comment. – [Matt] Thank you. – [Camille] Thank you. – [Matt] Betty Rhodes is next. – I’m really concerned about
the area around Hedingham and that was answered for me. – [Matt] Okay, thank you. Ed Brandle. – Good evening, my name’s Ed Brandle, I live in the Foxcroft subdivision and like many others here, I feel like we’re kind of being short changed by the brief time we can spend up here. I want to ask several things,
but under the conditions that prevail, I don’t think I can. One question I wanted to ask, though, and I had several. – [Man] Mr. Brandle, please ask
all the question you’d like. We don’t have as large a
group as we might’ve thought. If you’d like to ask a couple
of questions, go ahead. – Well, that’s good to note. Have you considered a fish ladder? Because there are several of us who would be glad to fund
a fish ladder to begin with if that was one of the main problems that you were facing and the reason you want to take the dam down. Was it because of the
shad going no further? They come 120 miles,
I don’t think 15 miles is gonna make that much
difference to the shad. – And likely, there are a
couple of things going on and one is a little bit
like putting dance shoes on a cow, you know. You’ve got an ugly,
decrepit facility there. Well, ugly in some people’s
views and not in others. But it’s a decrepit facility, which is continuing to gray, continuing to get older,
continuing to get less stable, and to take a very sophisticated thing like a fish latter and make
it an integral part of it is taking something that is very unstable and uncertain and putting
a modern device on it, which it seems unwise. Second, as an economic proposition, it might be a good idea if
you get past those concerns, but that wouldn’t produce
the credit sufficient for us to probably either
fund the fish latter or make it worthwhile. We don’t get the same number of credits for doing such an action as we would for what we’re doing here. – I thought that was
one of the main reason getting the shad a little further up the river and toward the dam. It is, there are actually
four different things we have to achieve to get the credits that we’ve defined. If we only achieve that,
it’ll be one fourth of the value of the project. – I’ve been down that river a lot of times in my boat, in those (mumbles) areas and so forth, wetlands. My opinion is that if it
ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There’s a lot of wildlife in there that’s going to be destroyed,
just a lot of wildlife. We had docked too to go to down to the Laurel Lake Dam. And I’ll tell you,
those people down there, they are hot. I mean, I wouldn’t even
wanna show up to go through that town now, ’cause they’re hot. They didn’t like the results of it at all. We went down there and
walked up around the lake, the river, that is, you
see a tire over here and that, this, and the other. The mayor, they were just
hot under the collar. They were just ready to boil over. I hate to think that this
would be left the same way and who’d clean up the debris upstream? – We’ll work with the agencies on that. There’s always some concern. They consider the woody debris in there to be a benefit to wildlife, so we’ve got to be careful. I think we can work out something where we can get passage through, if there is an adequate passage. We don’t know what it’s
gonna look like yet. But nature will take
care of it for one thing. The Lowell Dam has got nothing but better and better behind it. It gets continually cleans itself out in a natural manner and I imagine this river system will do the same thing. – I just know that there’s a lot of junk. I fish the river a lot too. Batch of springs and (mumbles) and everything else around there, so there’s a lot to be considered in the clean up if you go that route. – Just remember, all
that’s in there right now, it would be an aesthetic
thing to take it out because whatever environmental damage or toxic damage and that kind of stuff, that’s going on right now. So this not only gives us a chance to clean it up that we don’t have while the dam’s there. – So you’d clean up everything that’s exposed? – I can’t commit to that now, not to clean up everything that’s exposed. Again, if it’s woody debris
and that type of stuff. But if there’s an old Model T sitting down behind the dam, I guarantee
you, we’ll drag it out. – Well, I guess you would. By the way, I want to say something to the people, or Howard’s family. I knew Howard for 50
years, he was a good man and I appreciate him a lot. I was in Jaycees with him and so on and I was with him a week before he died. I’m gonna miss him. – [Woman] Thank you. – I know you do. I’ll deffer to the rest of the people. But I’d stay out of that area, down there in Laurel Dam. You won’t be safe, I don’t think. – Take a look at the Carbonton Dam. It’s a larger river and kind
of more similar to this one. If you ever make it down there, it’s only about a 45 minute drive and it’s quite attractive. – [Ed] Thank you. – Next question is Mr. Bill Jones. – [Bill] My question’s been answered. – Thank you, sir. John Connors. – Hello, I’m John Connors. As a wildlife biologist,
I appreciate what you do. In this particular case, I have to admit I’m a little skeptical of the benefits and here’s why. We’re trading ecosystems here, I think. So there is a functional, vibrant, as Ed said, wildlife rich environment that’s there right now, up above the dam. My concern is when we take the dam out, which I would normally support, the river system that’s up above from there to the False Lake Dam, the City of Raleigh made a decision when we put Falls Lake Dam in to infill that flood plain, that watershed. And that is one of the heaviest, neighborhood development
that took place in Raleigh. So all the streams that
we’re talking about, a percentage of them like Perry Creek, which I’m very familiar with, these are highly impacted streams. And so, sending the shad upstream to breed in these areas, you know, it’s a little bit wishful, I think. I can deffer to my friend Mike and Tim, maybe you can tell me more to reassure me that
this will actually work. That the shad will go up there and have success breeding. A measure of them making it to False Lake Dam, is
not a measure of success. It’s a measure of success of breeders surviving up to there, but we really should measure whether they successfully spawn and whether their young
make it back downstream. – [Man In Audience] You want me to — – Go ahead and take a shot. – I think when they did, success criteria they will be required to measure — – [Man In Black Shirt] Mike, I’m sorry, go ahead and introduce yourself. – I’m Mike (mumbles) with the
Fish and Wildlife Service. I think with a — They will be required — So they will be required to do that. I think if you look at most of these fish, the striped bass, American Shad, and you know, there’s a couple
of species of sturgeon too. The sturgeon get up and we don’t really
know how far they go up, but they might make it up there. But if you look at the
trail ways of Falls Lake and look at the water
coming over the lake. It’s fairly clear, it’s
good water quality. I suspect the bulk of
the actual productivity to augment the population
will be proximate Falls Lake. So the thing about these fish is that they have, you know, very high fecundity and you know, you might have one individual that has a half million. Depending on the species,
several 100,000 eggs. That’s where I think the
real benefit if gonna be, not so much up the trips at all, but you know, getting
right in that clean water coming off the trail ways of falls. But you’re right, at the end of the day what we really want to do is get these where people might be able to see a sturgeon in North Carolina. Most North Carolina natives
have never seen one. They’ve seen them back up in Richmond, you know, there are guys
who have lived there for 40 years and are
seeing six-foot sturgeon swimming under the
bridge, it’s kind of neat. – [Man] Why was the dam removed? – [Man] Well, because
of habitat restoration. I think, you know, they’ve done some spawning. They’ve done dam removal there too, but they’ve done a number of things there. That’s what we’re shooting for. – Is there any value in releasing those little fingerling shad that they’re doing now? People are raising them, releasing them to recolonize. Will there be any value in actually doing a test run? Like letting some of those things go off into Perry Creek
or some place upstream and see what the survival is this year. – [Man] We’ve got the
national fish hatcheries. We’ve got a fish hatchery in (mumbles). We realize that the production and the natural system exceeds what we can possibly produce
in our fish hatchery system. In other words, if we can
get the Neuse working, we could do the productivity of four or five national fish hatcheries. – My question is really like, the macroinvertebrate populations in those head water streams is very low. So there’s not very much for
these shad hatchlings to eat. – [Man] The food form is small larvae, the fish, you know, when it’s fertilized, you’ve got the egg sack
and then they exhaust that and then they’ve got the food. Really what you’re doing is inoculating the downstream area. If you look at the
distance between Falls Lake and the ocean, or the (mumbles), really you’re (mumbles) areas you’re really inoculating that with a larvae and stuff
that use that habitat that’s all those miles down stream. – [John] Okay. – Then important thing to
think about, John, is that — I mean, Hightower would be a
really good one to say this, but he would say, molten volcanic rock is basically a rocky riffly area, and if you look at the Neuse, you’ve got some around Smithsville, you’ve got some around Hillsborough. But then, when you’re
really getting into Raleigh, that’s where you’re really getting in the rocky bottom of the Neuse. But you go up towards Falls, if you’ve been in that stretch, that’s really primo habitat. So by getting the fish,
there’s plenty of area there to produce enough spawn to really utilize the nursery area of habitat
in the main stem Neuse. But there’s not spawning habitat in all those miles of the coastal plain. It’s just not suitable spawning habitat. – That helps. – Thank you. Next question. Oh, sorry. – I’d like to add a little bit to what Mike was saying. As far as even if Perry Creek was a good quality creek, probably wouldn’t expect American shad to go up into the small creeks. It’s kind of a river spawner. And then, one other point to make is, the migratory fish is just one component of the aquatic restoration. If you look at our baseline studies, our upstream control sites and our downstream control sites, the fish community at the control sites was much more what we’d expect in a free flowing river than what’s in the impoundment. To give an example, the
fresh water mussels, as far as abundance, we measure abundance by how many we find in a
certain period of time, how many per hour. The six sites within the impoundment, I think where you’re looking at eight or nine mussels per hour, whereas the downstream control sites were up in the 100s per hour. Upstream control right
near the Falls tail areas, we’re looking at 70 individuals. There’s definitely an adverse effect to those communities from existing dam. – Next question is from Janet Busset. – [Woman] Busset. – I’m sorry. – Hello everybody. I’ve been following this dog and pony show for two years. I live in Foxcroft, which borders the impoundment. The neighborhood is 180 acres. It’s Raleigh’s little secret. It’s full of nature. You come in there and
there’s (mumbles) everywhere. Turtles that are 40 years old. What I would ask as part of the process, is somebody coming there
and sample our neighborhood see what we have before this happens and after it happens. I do want to say thank you to Mr. Rigsby, Martin Dole, I’ve been following your work for several years. – [Martin] Thank you. – Actually, I read your thesis this week. Gave me a headache, but got through it. I have some first hand experience, like you, with the Lowell Dam. And I chime in with Mr. Randall. I’m not gonna repeat what he said, but what was interesting, was that it was your own hope that your research would help with future dam stream mitigation projects. (mumbles) , I think that’s great. I’m not gonna fight or say the dam going away, I’m not gonna go there. I’m gonna go a different angle. Use that working hat, I think it’s great. It’s not scientifically defensible because it’s based on standards
that you came up with. It’s all research. But it’s something that nobody else has probably done yet. What I think we need to do here, and I thank you that we
have this opportunity to come together and get
this out on the table. I’ve been into this for two years and I’m getting a headache. So it’s about time that all these leaders and everybody in the community got it out. Now, this is what I see. I have enough evidence
so far with Lowell Dam, all these other dams, but especially with what Mr. Rigsby said. He saw from the approach that you took, didn’t go in there and
do the blown (mumble). Pretty much punctured a hole in it, April you let out some water twice. You meet in December and
let some water out twice. Issue was, they didn’t bank on, they had a high precipitation event. Then it rained again in January. They had a lot of downstream flooding. Of course, that’s been documented. I’ve gotta control my hands
’cause I don’t want you to get distracted. The difference between Johnston County, and that’s where I got a
little bit of this twang from, ’cause I used to work
for the mayor down there. The difference between
where the Lowell Dam is and where this dam is, is
almost like night and day. This is a highly populated area, down there is not. I’ve been there, I’ve walked all around. What else I don’t see in this plan? What’s the emergency plan? What’s the contingency plan? What are the site protections? What kind of bond are you gonna put up? And five years is not good enough for me. I think it ought to be into perpetuity or at least 10 years at a minimum. And I think something
needs to be coordinated with the City of Raleigh to protect these people downstream and it needs to get out on the table. – [Man] I’m sorry, protect them from what? – From potential flood,
like Adam’s document. (mumbles) heard anybody when
all that flooding happened. It was 13 days straight. Are you gonna correct me? – I’ll respond to it. – You’re (mumbles) on that. I’ve read your paper, am I wrong? – I can tell, I can tell, great detail. – I think we need to do something. That’s all I’ve got to say. – Thanks for the comment. Two things to go out there. One is, we did learn a lot from Lowell and we’ve learn a lot
from other dam removals that I did not participate in and that we are fortunate enough to have a rich literature to go by. And when I say we’ve
learned a lot from Lowell, these two guys, to my right in particular, they’re the ones who
did a lot of the science that supported the mitigation project. My dissertation involved following flows through the reservoir
after the dam was removed. The dam did not add flows. I think that’s an important distinction. The removal of that dam
did not cause a flood. I monitored the movement of sediment and nutrients through the old impoundment during flood events. So what I was curious about, and with the help of Martin and Doyle and a few of my colleagues, there you can see, was
once the dam’s removed, we know that’s a susceptible time for that impoundment, as
you noted, it’s sensitive. We were curious what happens. What ends up leaving the impoundment has been stored over 100 plus years and where does it go. We monitored dozens of miles of river and we followed what I referred to as a flood wave in my paper,
but it was not a flood, it never left the banks
of the little river. It was simply a pulse of water with some sediment and some nutrients. I need to make that distinction and I’ll gladly answer question about it as this is important. Removing Milburnie Dam is not gonna cause flooding downstream. Not during the process and not because there’s a rain event after the process. We will not create a flood downstream. Now what may happen and
what you’re referring to in that paper, is something
that I did call a flood wave and I wrote that out. Now, I’m second guessing
the use of that term. Six years later. But what it was, it was
during the dewatering process, you’re right, I released it twice. It was during the dewatering process, they opened the gates up and there was, what I should’ve called, a pulse of water and material that moved downstream. So there’s stored water behind the dam, it then enters the little river and then moves downstream. It never left the banks
of the little river, so it was not a flood, that is — Martin, you deserve to be reprimanded for letting me write that in that paper. It was not a flood wave,
so I apologize for that. To summarize, two quick distinctions. You’re right, Lowell is not Milburnie. We did learn some lessons at Lowell. We learned some lessons at Carbonton. But there were several more, thanks to (mumbles)
Rivers, we saw this flood. Thousand other dam removals out there from which we can work. And we can avoid making mistakes that have been made over
a 1000 over dam removals. So there’s a lot going in there. And it’s not gonna flood downstream because we dewatered Milburnie. It’s an important distinction. – Next question is Terri Benton. – Thank you, a lot of
questions have been answered and I guess not answered this evening. But I guess at this time
we’ll have to take that. But I appreciate you being here tonight. A couple of questions from the homeowners along the Neuse River. Ed touched on it, will
the debris be cleaned up from the river because
when we watched the videos from my friend, Jeanna went down and she shot them, we found there’s a lot of debris on the river bank and left a mess and
people were very unhappy. Will the banks be seeded? And with Restoration Systems will be able to post a bond to compensate
homeowners for lost wells. Our other concern, as I live
in Riverbend Plantation. When this first started coming around, people from Restoration
Systems apparently went and spoke with our neighbors about the Stoud Way and they expressed to the neighbors that when the river, the dam goes away, there’ll be no flooding
in our neighborhood. So I’m concerned about
the level of the water in Stoud Lake as well,
which is in our subdivision, which is Riverbend. We’re concerned. Can you address whether that lake level will be affected if the dam is taken out? – I can give you very general answers. I am not familiar with that lake. I don’t know how it’s formed. Obviously, I would imagine there’s a dam. It’s probably not a natural lake. – [Terri] Right. – I don’t know the nature of that dam. I don’t know where it’s located relative to the Neuse River, and so honestly, I can’t give you a good plan of action.
– So that would be a question that I could pose and send in and give you coordinates. – Yes, ma’am, I will
gladly look into that. – And how about the wells that most of my neighbors are on as far as damage to the wells if the dam goes away? – You know, that is a common
fear with dam removal, is that — And it’s a logical concern. Is that if you lower the
water level of the river, do you affect the local
ground water table, the depth of that table? Its placement in the soil. In some cases, yes,
locally you can see that. I’m not familiar with
each individual well. We didn’t see that problem at Lowell, and we didn’t see that
problem at Carbonton. To order, John, were you
ever called by somebody who couldn’t draw on ground water because you removed the dam? So I think that ground water is affected to a certain extent. The depth at which we usually drill in order to get ground water
for drinking water purposes, is much greater than the dam is gonna cause and affect it. In other words, the
straw goes so deep down to tap into the ground
water that I don’t think the dam is going to have an effect. – I’m sorry our neighbor and good friend, Ed Small couldn’t be here tonight, because he really is, I’m sure
you’re very familiar with Ed. He has a science behind him he can really listen to what you’re saying and make sense of it and
he can ask questions. I wish he were here. I did bring a copy of
the letter that he wrote in response to the public. I’d love to hand it out if I could. They probably have it at corp, but he had so many questions that I’m not sure really,
some been answered. – I will gladly, please
leave your information. – Okay.
– So that I can contact you. – Lauris is right at the back of the room, you can leave all your information. Next question is Ted Dunn. – My name is Ted Dunn, I live
in the Woods Creek subdivision which is adjacent to Foxcroft. I think you’ve done an excellent job in your presentation. It’s provided much more information than what I heard before. I guess my position would be that, I think that whenever we would extend the natural habitat of the Neuse River for an additional 15 miles,
that’s very appealing. As I listened to everything, I realized the Army Corps of Engineers can’t say they’re either for this or against this, but they
have to remain neutral. But I think that for the neighbors, who may not be exactly
adjacent to the river or the dam, but are in the vicinity and have these legitimate concerns, that you work through the process, as you’ve obviously done so far to address our concerns, but one of the things that
was touched on briefly that I think that in addition to extending the natural habitat of the river to what it used to be is that we have a structure
that no longer serves its original purpose,
and with the extension of the Greenway by the
Raleigh Park System, it seems that we have what is, I’m not an attorney, but I think it would be referred to as almost like a public nuisance in the sense that you have a dam that
has taken lives before. I know from where I grew up, that’s what dams do. Like you said, they don’t
kill one person sometimes, they kill two people,
or the number of people that go to rescue the original victim. So that if the current owners of this dam want the liability to go away and they don’t want the
risk of future deaths on their property because of the proximity to the Greenway, it’s almost, if I was an attorney, we
talk about scales of justice, and rarely is anything ever 100% and it’s obviously isn’t
going to be 100% in your favor because of the concerns of
the neighbors in Foxcroft and Woods Creek and perhaps heading down. That would seem like they would consider the life safety issues
and so many other things that we’re talking about here that you would still tip the scales in favor of what you want to do. I am so impressed with what you’ve done. Attending this, I’m more likely to support what you’re trying to do,
but hope that you will for the neighbors, continue to address their individual concerns. Thank you. – [Men] Thank you. – The next question is
from Cheryl Gregory. – [Cheryl] I didn’t have a question. – Oh, okay, great. Next question, John Holly. – Listening with a great interest to a lot of the information
that’s being presented and one thing that I
didn’t hear a lot about and just encourage you to take a look at, if you haven’t already, is potential for head cutting erosion
in some of the tributaries that feed now into the open water. A lot of that is directly adjacent to or actually bordering on private land and there could be some property damage that is a part of that erosion process that’s gonna naturally occur. And so some of that may need
to be addressed structurally, in the process of taking the dam out and doing som work to correct erosion. I would encourage that to be looked that. My question I guess would be, how much has that been looked at and have you anticipated
some potential problem areas? – Thanks for bringing that up and that is obviously a concern that you have when you move a dam. Head cut migration is
fairly common to see. In certain situations,
you want to see that. In other situations, like you just noted, you don’t want to see that. My biggest concern for head cuts right now is that open water area just
below (mumble) Dam Lake. And we’re working to develop a strategy so that we don’t have that problem there. Other areas that I have noted. – We were out there today. – Yeah, in fact we were. Other areas I’ve noted, seem to have some hardened structures, they’re dams with lots and lots and lots of riff raff that connect the tail
of the dam to the river. That’s good. I mean it’s not great habitat, but that’s great for a concern like you just voiced and
that we certainly share. And that will be part of the process to identify those spots
and see what we can do to avoid the problems. Because, we want to
avoid problems like that, that’s important. – I just want to add, John. I actually spoke with
Mel Nevils this morning, who I believe you work with and I was speaking with
him on another matter. He brought this up too and I committed to sit down with you
guys at Land Resources and go on over it in some detail. – I believe this particular project would end up with the city jurisdiction. The city has a local
(mumbling) control over. Of course, it’s delegated to them by us. So we would be working hand-in-hand — – Well you all are experts too. We would involve the city as well. – Thank you, Mr. Holly. – Jay Saint Claire. – Hey guys, this gentleman over here hit on the first question I had too. The first one was, I was curious, is it a rumor or is it true
that people have drowned here and so how many people have drowned as a result of that dam. – Well, thanks, Mr. Saint Claire. We got interested in that question after the two deaths this Summer. And I asked a young
fellow that works for us to go down to the Neuse Observer and look it up. It didn’t take him too long. I think we identified 11 deaths that were in the paper that
he was able to pull notice some of them quite horrifying. Four of eight of those were doubles. In other words, there were four instances where two people died, including a, I don’t mean to be dramatic, but a one armed vegetable produce merchant who went in after his wife, who never swam a day in his life. And yet he had one arm and went in after and he went down, and that
was on the cover then. And what we figure is that there are more single drownings out there that didn’t get picked up by the paper, because it’s not as
newsworthy when two die. You’d have either always kills in two’s, which is unlikely, or there
are many more drownings than just the 11. So, there’s 11 known,
and only four of those in the last five years. And I suspect that going back, it would be many more and above 20. – [Woman] There’s a small park there that Carolyn and my father
came gave the city of (mumbles) where people can go that’s public, a little public area. And there’s postings and
stuff about swimming, but it’s hot, it’s 95
degrees in the Summer and a five year old is (mumbles) fishing. It’s just inevitable when
someone’s gonna tempt fate. – That’s an excellent point. And it brings up the Greenway part. If you say that the number
of people that drown or get in trouble out there is a function of how many people visited
in the first place, which would seem logical, that was a very obscure
location in Raleigh. As you know, you can
talk to a lot of people who live in Raleigh, some
of them their whole lives and you bring up the Milburnie Dam and they’ve never seen it, that’s not going to be the case after they open up a full Greenway to the Neuse Blueway. There are going to be
thousands upon thousands of new visitors that
never would have known that place was there. They’re gonna find a new swimming hole and that’s gonna serve
as an attractive nuisance that the Twiggs no
longer want to maintain. – We put signs up, they rip them down. They rip through fences. It’s just an impossible
thing to keep up with. – [Man] And it’s only gonna get worse. – [Woman] Right. What’s scary too is that
the water on the surface looks calm and still and underneath it is where the strong current is. It may look innocent, but it’s not. – Right. – Second question, I’ll
try to make this quick is for Mr. Rigby. You did a good job talking about, I think, the theory behind some
of the negative impacts that are a result of a dam being put into a (mumbling). And you also talked about some
of the ecological benefits that can come from removing the dam. So my question for you is, as part of this (drowned
out by cough), yourself, what have you witnessed
and specific documented. Maybe some of the highlights of dam removals with this group. – In terms of ecological changes. – [Man] The changes. – I think the most
remarkable accomplishment, if you will, or benefit,
was the Cape Fear Shiner and the Deep River. It was one of the only
ecosystem restoration projects on the East Coast that I’m aware of where we got federally protected species to recolonize and a significantly
long stretch of river. 10 miles, plus additional miles in some of the larger tributaries. In fact, Tim continues to go back and document new
occurrences of the species and further and further
back into the (mumbles), which I think is just fascinating. We’ve also seen some
great shifts in habitat. I mean, these guys have
been through the river a lot more than I have, to be honest. Because both those removals took place while I was conducting
my dissertation research and I did study them. But then I left in 2006 and these guys just kept going back year
after year after year. So if they want to expand,
I certainly pass it along. – I mentioned that the
Benthic macroinvertebrates are one of the first to change and that’s what we observed at both of the removals that we were involved in. With them being the
base of the food chain, it supported, I think,
the fish species change that Tim will be able to comment on. And then ultimately, the fish are believe the host for mussels. That’s why the mussels are
the last step in that process. We also had, you know,
when the water goes down, the river bed didn’t
always change as much. I mean, there’s some sudden deposition, but then you also see you know, when the water goes down, the riffle and pool
sequence gets reestablished and say you have periods
of shallow, fast water within deeper slow water. And those were there
immediately in the first year. But even over successive
years of monitoring, extra ones would pop up as sediment was getting cleared out of those. Seeing those habitats established was really great. I always had to be safety
conscious with our crews, but they loved going through those riffles on their canoes and stuff. And I go, you have $15,000
worth of gear in that boat! (mumbles) Seeing that and then you know. I’ve heard several folks say that there are great wildlife and you know, I totally understand that and agree with that and
I think you’re gonna see that you are going to
continue to see great wildlife and you’ll see a lot more
birds all the way down along the creek. Wading birds fishing and I think that those things will continue. – Just add to that, as
an aquatic ecologist, I love great flowing rivers. In the presentation I’ve done about the Carbonton Dam removal, got a shot of me standing at a ripple spot and I tell the story, when we did the pre-removal baseline surveys, it was 17 feet deep at that spot. We had to scuba dive to sample the bottom, whereas, we were doing it wading. And ripple habitats are very species rich, very diverse, and as an ecologist, that’s what you look for. – [Man] Right, thanks Pat. – [Woman] There really isn’t
a free flowing river, though. The corps (mumbles) control of the lease. Is that not true? – It seems to be a going point, and it’s something worth pointing out, but keep in mind, that’s
true for every river in North Carolina. If you’re on the Roanoke,
you’re controlled from the Carl Lakes Dam,
whatever they call that. If you’re in the Cape Fear at any point, there are 17 dams on the Cape Fear. So that every point along
the Cape Fear is controlled. Moving along, I think
there’s no major river that reaches into the
Piedmont, North Carolina that isn’t controlled. That said, I think it will
put significant pressure on the corps. You’d think it’d be prevailed upon to probably do more nature
like releases there. – I think we know that this provides the waters from Raleigh. – [Man] That’s right. – Considering the fact that the environment’s changing dramatically as it is and there’s
bound to be a drought. A drastic drought, a (mumbles) drought. Probably in our near future, maybe in our lifetime, certainly. When the people need water more than the river needs
water, what’s gonna happen? – Well, just remember that the people who live in Smithfield, have been dealing with the natural water level in that river and it’s never gone dry. You’ve never heard them say — – [Man] Smithfield is a
lot smaller community. – Right, but the rivers continue to flow. The Neuse has never
gone dry below the dam. There’s always been a flowing river, even during the 2007 drought. Right? There’s a minimum release. There’s a wall that says that
(mumbles) there is serious. – [Man] Not a wall. – Not a wall? – [Man] No, it’s an agreement. – Okay. An agreement that they have to release a certain amount of water
for ecological purposes. – Folks, can we just ask
anyone who’s asking a question, since we are recording this for official U.S. Army Corps of Engineer records, that you ask your questions
at the microphone. And we have one more person who registered that they want to ask a question, so I want to get to them. – Matt, it’s okay, we’ll wrap this up and get to the next person. – Okay, please. – In the document, there
is a hydrological analysis because that’s required by the corps. In other words, will
there be a sustainable flow regime to support the ecosystem we are proposing to restore. And our analysis indicates that yes, there should be. Now, extreme events are extreme events. The Neuse would run dry
if we were in that type of drought as you indicated, regardless of where the
falls are as they are not. – [Man] We talked about Milburnie Dam, it still be above — – Well it too would run dry if it was such an extreme event. Milburnie doesn’t create water, it just holds on to it,
which it evaporates, goes downstream, whatever the case may be. In this case, George was
mentioning an agreement that Smithfield has with
the Army Corps of Engineers and the state governments to release water for water quality purposes downstream. In other words, I believe it’s Smithfield that has a waste water discharge. If there’s not enough water being released from falls, it’s heavily
concentrated pollution. High amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus. They want to avoid that
and they want to avoid the smell that comes with it. So that’s why you see a
fairly reliable release. And again, I wrote this
document so long ago, I don’t recall the details immediately, but it’s in there. It’s under hydrological analysis section. And if you have questions
after reading that, please get back with me or follow up with me again and I will
have read it more thoroughly and will be able to more
accurately answer that. – I’ll just add one thing to your question about is it a free flowing natural river. It’s not natural, as George mentioned, it is regulated, but our control sites, which are upstream of
the current impoundment, we show that the fish fauna, the fresh water mussel fauna are kind of what you’d expect from a
free flowing river system. So we expect those species to recolonize the impoundment that is
created by Milburnie. – [Woman] It’s unfortunate, I understand the (mumbles) point of view that they want to get rid of the dam. I know there have been several people that have said that have said they would speak with
them on a private basis, in fact, (mumbles) in
Winston-Salem to speak with Carolyn Fox and he was intercepted by Mr. Howard, he didn’t want to allow that conversation to go on. – Man, that’s not true. – [Woman] That’s not true? – No, I went down with
him, greeted her with him. She asked me to come with him because she felt a little bit intimidated that someone wanted to come
and talk her out of something. – That’s not intimidating. He said he felt (drowned out). – She wanted me to come
there and be with her. I didn’t intercept and we rode
down the elevator together, welcomed her back to her room and I did my best to answer questions that she couldn’t answer. – [Man] Did he limit
the number of questions that Mr. Howard could ask? – [Man] No. – Alright, next. Our final question that someone
had indicated ahead of time and then we can take a few more while we have time available. Jeff, and I’m sorry if I
get this wrong, Destreach. – A follow up I think on
the hydrological question. Is there any hydrological effect on the nine miles above the pool? Are there any shock absorber effects from having that pool down there? Or a rate change? – [Man] Rephrase that
question for me, I’m sorry. – On the section of river above the pool, the pool water. – Which is the impoundment? – Above the impoundment. – Between the impoundment
and falls (mumbles), is there gonna be any
hydrological change for that? Is the flow gonna feel faster or — – You know, I expect the
answer is inforseeably yes. Impoundments we have to draw a line and say the effect stops here, but that’s not necessarily true. Because there are secondary effects. I think yes, it could
get a little bit faster, but I don’t think that you would notice, to be honest. – Alright, and I believe we have time for two more questions. Sir. – I indicated I wanted to ask a question. I’m Jim Hayden from Foxcroft. My interest in the river
is that I knew the river with my children and my grandchildren, so I really enjoyed the (mumbles), because I could (mumbles) right down to where my property is. But my question is, the real reason for taking down the dam is to receive the mitigation credits and
the goals that you have are to achieve or to measure
how much credits you get. I notice you guys
sitting at the table here are pretty much of the same community. You’re interlinked to some degree. And I suppose in monitoring the river, that those monitoring
studies are paid for by RS, is that correct? – [Man] Mmh hmm. – Now, my question is how do you maintain your independence when your client is gonna be the person who benefits from your results. Who monitors your
independence is my question. – I’ll be glad to take a shot at that. And obviously Restoration Systems is a sponsor of the mitigation bank. As you’ve heard from the
owners of the dam tonight, the dam is their private property, they wish to see it removed. We’ve been engaged in the effort with them to go through the permitting process. The team of consultants
we have up here tonight does work for many other clients, much bigger and more powerful
than Restoration Systems. And their projects have to be reviewed by the Corps of Engineers too. I think that in the spirit of a positive discourse, you shouldn’t cast dispersions on the team of consultants
we have up here tonight or the quality of their work because if there was a
made as instructed type of work product, they would
not have any credibility with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for other clients. And instead, they have a
great deal of credibility based on their track record,
of long successful projects. – Anyone want to speak
(mumbles) integrity (mumbles). – I understand why you asked the question, I get it. I’m sure you understand the response I’m about to give you, which is, I like to be a person of integrity. I went to school studying
systems that I love and I hoped that when I got out, I could be a part of
something that was giving back and I wasn’t taking paychecks and that was the only concern. I like to get paid, I’ll be honest, I do have two small children,
and a wife, and a house. So I do have to pay the bills, but I don’t do it at the
expense of my integrity. And I don’t think these guys do either. – I’ll just add to that. We are contracted by Restoration Systems, but the amount that we get paid has no bearing on whether they receive maximum credit or no credit. We’re getting paid the
same amount regardless. If the dam’s removed and Restoration Systems aren’t awarded any credits, we’re still gonna be
expecting our paycheck. – [Man] We’re not being paid by the shad. – [Matt] Alright, we have
time for one final question. – [Man] I believe I put my name, or I put a check mark. – I’m sorry, it looks
like we missed a couple. Please come on up. Could you just state your name when you get to the microphone. – My name is Ferrel Benton, I live right on the river. I enjoy the river the way it is. I’m wondering why the
leak, depth in species, they’re such a bad thing. Looks like they’re all
gonna go away again. In return you’ll get one,
maybe two week opportunity to watch the shad swim by and that’s some wild catching. Also, I didn’t realize they
were an endangered species. I also understand that they
are commercially fished, I can’t imagine that would be allowed if that were in fact the case. The other thing is, (mumbles) our neighborhood,
we have a little lake there, we spend a lot of money
to maintain the lake. It’s a lake called Lake Iris. I’m surprised you didn’t notice it, it backs right up to the dam. – [Man] I’m sure I noticed it, I don’t know which one is
yours, that’s my problem. Sorry about that. – When the water level
in the river comes up due to flooding or due
to releases from the dam, False Lake Dam. Our neighborhood floods,
and it doesn’t flood by coming back over the dam. It seeps up through the sand. So we know that the sand is coarse enough to allow water to come up through it. Obviously it’s gonna be coarse enough that the water goes back down through it. So when that level goes down, our lake’s gonna go away. I’m 99% positive for that. I’m just wondering how we’ll
be compensated for that. – A lot of questions there. Tim, will you address
the species questions? – Yeah, the lake adapted species, they won’t disappear. They’ll inhabit pools. As Adam mentioned earlier,
rather than homogeneous river of just deep, full habitat,
you’ll have ripple runs and pools. And so those species that are there now, we expect them to continue to be there. Just not totally dominating. It will be more ecologically
diverse fish bottom. The bit about the American
shad being endangered, it’s not an endangered species. There are state, endangered
state threatened species that do occur in the Neuse River and we hope to see a
benefit to those species from removal and that’s maybe where the confusion came from. – Again, in reference to the dam. I certainly follow up
with you guys on that. That is the same lake, correct? (mumbles) So we’ll follow up with you on that. Again, I don’t know the location exactly. I do know the soils fairly well in that flood plain area
along the whole impoundment and it’s not as much sand as you think. Now your location may be
completely different story and I haven’t seen it and
haven’t been on the ground yet, but what I know going up
and down that impoundment is a whole heck of a lot of fine sediment. Fine sediment doesn’t actually allow for a lot of flow up and down. It traps water and holds
on to it very effectively. That’s just my observation
across the region as a whole. I’m not trying to discredit or challenge your observations over time. You know your place better than I do. I’ll gladly make a visit and we’ll learn what I can learn and I’ll
share with you what I learn. – If the water level changes
there changes that dramatically in the near future … – Is there a dam in place now, sir? Okay, so chances are good. And again, I’ll learn more
once I’m on the ground. Chances are good, someone built that dam to hold water that was coming up slow. That’s what dams are for. They didn’t build the dam to hold water that comes in underground. Because you wouldn’t need a dam if it simply exchanged underground. A dam usually traps surface
water, not ground water. It’s not always the case, but the position of the dam, I’m just assuming based on
what I learned here tonight, suggests to me is capturing water coming from up slope along the bank and then it’s holding it in place. Your experience, and again, I’m not trying to argue. – [Man] (mumbles) I couldn’t
tell you whether (mumbles). – I’ll be glad to take a look, and everything I learn, I’ll share. – [Matt] Alright now. – [Mike] I wanted to add,
I think then on one thing to think about, I work with
the Fish and Wildlife Service, so I’m a civil servant to the population to this state and city and locals. The way I look at it
is that I think there’s a real misconception
about why I would support this type of thing. If you just look at the stretch of river from the dam, you know, past your property or even up to the lake, and the benefit that people have seen the fish, American shad, sturgeon and whatever, as it relates to that property, is relatively finite. It’s like you said, what’s
the benefit if I see a shad or even if there’s 10
people fishing for them. What’s the big deal? There’s not a big a deal about that. The thing you’ve got to bare in mind is the fish that spawn in this area are the same ones that
feed the speckled trout, the puppy (mumbles), the flounders, the blue fish, the tunas, the mackerels, the dolphins. When you get down to Oriental, get down to Atlantic Beach, if you look at the recreational fishing industry in North Carolina, it’s
a $1.4 billion industry. There’s a lot of people who
make their living doing that. A lot of people’s
children have their jobs. It’s a state and federal resource. If it was a private farm pond, or a private lake, absolutely. But the thing is, I
think there’s a problem and that some people consider
the river their lake. It is very important to the populace of the state and the country and that’s the reason
we’re interested in it. If it wasn’t a huge
benefit, I would personally never support it, because obviously, some people love the dam
and think it’s pretty and that kind of thing. – The question I have about that is to have the least impact,
why wouldn’t a fish ladder be just as effective? – We’re building a fish ladder. The Corps of Engineers is
locking them number one as a $13 million project. Now we’ve got steep pass ladders that hold like — In other words, that’s one of the things that I interact with,
building fish ladders. To build a fish ladder on Milburnie Dam would probably cost several $100,000. We’ve been trying to get funding to build a fish ladder at Carbtree Creek, which is owned by the City of Raleigh, they’re pretty sweet on it. I mean, they’ve got no objection. The homeowners there, that
are the controlling interest in last year’s Mill Dam,
and I talked to people, they were at the dam. I feel fairly confident in dealing with these type of things before. If we built it and looked nice and keep it with that historic structure, they’d be fine with it. The problem is there’s no money to do things like that. I think the notion that fish ladders are relatively inexpensive
is generally and not true, they’re fairly expensive. – Several million dollars
make in credit stuff available to … (muffled voices) – In core speak, that
would be an alternative. And the alternative wouldn’t
work for two reasons. One, Mike was getting
in it, it’s expensive. Just because we pass shad over Milburnie, doesn’t mean it generates enough credits to pay for the fish ladder, in fact, it probably doesn’t. That’s the least productive
ecological component of this project in terms
of credit potential. We have to think like that. This is a project that has a budget. And whatever credits we generate, we have to be able to
sell to recoup the cost. The other thing is that
it probably increases their liability at the site. They still have a dam in place, that hasn’t gone away, and now they probably added another
nuisance on top of it. Now you’re gonna have the potential for people to climb up
and down a fish ladder. That sounds like you just increased — – [Woman] On an old structure. – On an old structure. Right, and George brought
that point up earlier that you know, you’re putting some new, nice piece of technology on top of a very old, old foundation. – As far as that goes, as far as where there’s a concern for safety, now taking that dam down,
it’s just gonna expose more areas of rocks and places where a current isn’t obvious
all along the river bank and that together with the Greenway, I would think the safety issue is going to be disbursed, it’s just gonna be (mumbles). – The simple fact is the owners
don’t perceive it that way and they’re the ones that are bearing the cost and the anxiety for your aesthetic pleasure. And I don’t mean that as
flippin’ as it sounds, but that’s what’s going on now. They’re no longer willing to bear that. Even if some other alternatives, their opinion is the most
important opinion in the room. If they didn’t want the dam removed, we wouldn’t be here. – But we’re open for other
people to purchase the dam. I mean, that’s certainly a conversation. – There are more than one concern. What I want to say is, I
really honor and appreciate your long patience with this long process. And I also understand that you have private concerns for your private property
because it’s going to affect your private property. As I try to say, and I’m
not a public speaker, but my father did not go into this without thinking this through. He was a citizen of Raleigh in a big way. He cared deeply about the public. And he chose these people because he knows that they were going to do something that was going to have
the least negative damage as possible for everybody else. The only thing that I want to say is, I honor and hear your concerns and it is my hope that this
process, what you’ve seen, will at least alleviate
some of your concerns. There will be change,
change is inevitable, change will happen. Change is hard and there’s
gonna be pros and cons for everybody. And I have to reiterate what George said. Honestly, I’m really
just following through with my father’s wishes, I’m not been that involved in the process, although he talked to me a lot about it. I’m seeing why he wanted
to make this decision. He had grave concerns for
Carolyn and her family, as you can imagine. In addition, he was very
concerned about liability. And he did have an environmental concern. It’s on several levels,
it’s not just about shad, it’s not just about lake bubbles. It’s about so many things. And my hope is that although
it will change the area, it will still be really beautiful. I think it will still be really beautiful and I don’t think my dad
would have chosen this path if he thought he was going to leave a mess for other people. I just see he wasn’t that person. I really don’t think that’s gonna happen. And I hope the hard work of
these people’s presentation has certainly impressed me, and I hope, you see, there really is a genuine effort. Money will be made, there’s
money in this process, that’s how it’s gonna work. But, it’s not about coming
and just raping the land and rolling over people
and taking the money. It’s really not. – [Woman] We love the river as well, we’re out there every
year (drowned out) it. – I know. – [Woman] We’re very
much participating … – I know, and I appreciate you guys being so participatory. – Another thing about the dam going away, that’s going to make the river accessible to canoers and kayakers. People who now can take advantage of miles of the river by going in another boat other than the kayak boat commute will lose access to that river. I have elderly uncles,
elderly step-father-in-law that really very much loves
to come and go fishing there. That’s gonna go away for them. There’s no way that
they’ll be able to access that big mile stretch. And I’m just wondering if
there aren’t other people who are not as well and abled. You guys are gonna be old someday and maybe would like to have something like that available. It’s just a comment and I think it’s a fair comment. So you’re taking something away other than monetary value. – [Woman] I think that … – [Mike] I work around dams a lot. I have the unfortunate task of sometimes talking to parents who’s
children have died in dams. Apex Fire Department that pulled out the two kids that drowned last Summer. It’s hard for somebody like me. I may have liabilities
working on fish ladders and helping with people’s drownings, but liabilities don’t
drive somebody like me, but what does drive me is that if I know that you’re doing something that will ultimately
result in a child’s death that was avoidable, that’s
a very driving thing for somebody like me. – More kids draw in buckets
than drown in a dam. – [Mike] If the hydraulic
beneath Milburnie Dam, underneath the tail ways,
esisodically is such that I couldn’t swim past it. I don’t think anybody
could swim through it. I’ll take you out there
and show you sometime if you’d like to. It’s a death trap. It’s not a situation where somebody can’t swim, it’s not what it is. I’ll be happy to show it
to you if you’d like me to. – Alright folks, I think — – Any kind of water is a death trap. – [Mike] Absolutely. – [Mike] Children or not. – I’m talking about … – [Mike] That’s not correct. I mean the potential to
drown and anything is there, this curler hydraulic, it’s a death trap. – Alright, I want to thank everyone for coming out tonight
and staying a lot longer than we all originally planned. – [Man] If we have more questions, who do we … – Yes, if you have more questions, Lauris is at the back of the room. – [Man] Let me explain something. – Please go to him and
you can register you name, contact information, and who you think would be the best person
from the team up here to respond to you and
we will get back to you. Thank you all. – Special thanks to Tiffany (mumble). – [Woman] Thank you, Tiffany, thank you. (crowd background chatter)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *